
A Very Stable Genius
Philip Rucker, Carol Leonning
What's inside?
Explore the tumultuous journey of Donald J. Trump's presidency, his unique leadership style, and the impact it has had on America.
You'll learn
Key points
01Trump's self-belief wasn't due to pride, but because he didn't really get how being a president works
When Donald Trump stepped up to accept the Republican presidential nomination in 2016, he made a bold claim: "I alone can fix it." He painted himself as the only answer to America's problems, the one who would bring the nation back to its glory days. But, as we'll see, this wasn't a sign of arrogance or overconfidence. Instead, it was a sign that Trump didn't quite get what being President was all about. You see, being President isn't a one-man show. It's not about making all the decisions yourself. It's about having a team of smart, capable people around you to help guide the country. But Trump didn't seem to get that. He often acted on his own, making decisions without consulting others. Take his approach to foreign policy, for example. Trump didn't play by the rules. He shook up long-standing alliances and seemed to cozy up to dictators, rather than democratic leaders. But this wasn't because he had a grand strategy or a deep understanding of international relations. It was because he thought he could do it all himself. And then there's how he ran his administration. Instead of carefully picking a team of leaders to help him, Trump often went with his gut, grabbing opportunities and getting rid of anyone who got in his way. This might work in business, but in politics, it's a different story. It showed that Trump didn't understand that being President is about working together, not going it alone. Peter Wehner, a guy who's worked for three Republican administrations and was one of the first to call out Trump, warned that Trump's belief in his own genius was more harmful than helpful. He and others saw Trump's self-confidence as a sign of instability, not strength. So, to sum it up, Trump's belief in himself wasn't about pride. It was about not understanding what being President really means. His go-it-alone approach, his disregard for alliances, and his gut-driven leadership style weren't signs of a strong leader. They were signs of a President who didn't quite get the complexities and responsibilities of his job.
02Trump picked pals over pros for his team, which led to a bunch of scandals
When a new president steps into the White House, they've got a big job ahead of them. One of the first tasks? Staffing their administration. This means picking out the right people for key roles like advisors, cabinet members, and other bigwigs. Ideally, these folks should know their stuff and have plenty of experience under their belts. But according to Philip Rucker and Carol Leonning, Trump had a different game plan. Instead of going for the most qualified, he picked his team based on how loyal they were to him. Take Michael Flynn, for example. Flynn was a big Trump supporter during the campaign and even managed to get in good with Trump's family. This loyalty landed him a spot in the administration. But here's the thing: this loyalty-first approach had some serious downsides. By putting loyalty before qualifications, Trump left his administration wide open to scandals. Flynn, for instance, was secretly being investigated by the FBI for his contacts with Russia's ambassador. Trump didn't know about this when he appointed Flynn, and when the news broke, it caused a major scandal. This shook up the administration and sowed seeds of distrust that stuck around for the rest of Trump's time in office. And it wasn't just about loyalty. Trump also seemed to care more about image and branding than actual qualifications. His daughter Ivanka and her husband Jared Kushner were keen to work in the West Wing, seeing it as a chance to boost their personal brands. But their lack of political experience and understanding of government ethics and law led to even more controversies and scandals. So, to sum it up, Trump's decision to put loyalty and personal relationships before qualifications and experience led to a whole bunch of scandals and controversies. Rucker and Leonning argue that this approach ended up hurting the effectiveness and credibility of his presidency.

Continue reading with LeapAhead app
Full summary is waiting for you in the app
03Trump's dodgy past made it tough for him to find a lawyer to represent him
04Even with his insecurities, Trump still thought he was the best man for the job
05Kelly's credibility, once a big plus for Trump's team, took a hit because of his role in the Porter mess
06Trump's strategic moves to win the Senate were a major win in his political career
07Out of all the Republicans, Trump really valued and often sought advice from Mark Meadows
08In politics, loyalty and betrayal are two sides of the same coin
09Conclusion
About Philip Rucker, Carol Leonning
Philip Rucker is the White House Bureau Chief at The Washington Post. Carol Leonnig is a national investigative reporter at the same newspaper. Both are Pulitzer Prize-winning journalists known for their in-depth reporting and analysis of American politics.