
The Color of Law
Richard Rothstein
What's inside?
Explore the hidden history of how U.S. government policies led to housing segregation in America, and understand its lasting impact on today's society.
You'll learn
Key points
01The Genesis of Segregation
In the early 20th century, America was a nation still healing from the wounds of the Civil War and the abolition of slavery. However, beneath the surface, a new form of division was taking root, one that was more insidious and enduring. This was the era of racial segregation, a period marked by policies and practices that systematically marginalized African Americans, creating a divide that persists to this day. One of the most significant policies of this era was redlining. This discriminatory practice, employed by banks, insurance companies, and other institutions, involved refusing or limiting loans, mortgages, and insurance within specific geographic areas, particularly inner-city neighborhoods. These areas, predominantly inhabited by African Americans, were marked as high-risk and thus undesirable for investment. Redlining was not just a financial strategy; it was a tool of racial segregation, effectively confining African Americans to certain areas and limiting their economic opportunities. Alongside redlining, restrictive covenants played a crucial role in shaping the racial landscape of America. These contractual agreements prohibited the purchase, lease, or occupation of a property by a particular group of people, usually African Americans. These covenants were often included in the deed to a property, making them legally enforceable and further entrenching racial segregation. The Federal Housing Administration (FHA), established in 1934, played a pivotal role in exacerbating racial segregation. The FHA refused to insure mortgages in and near African-American neighborhoods, a policy that mirrored redlining. At the same time, it subsidized builders who were mass-producing entire subdivisions for whites, with the stipulation that none of the homes be sold to African Americans. This policy not only reinforced the physical segregation of neighborhoods but also contributed to the racial wealth gap. The concept of 'de jure' segregation, a form of segregation enforced by law, was another significant aspect of this era. This was in stark contrast to 'de facto' segregation, which occurs as a result of social circumstances, such as housing patterns. The government, at all levels, played a significant role in enforcing 'de jure' segregation, further institutionalizing racial division. The case of Shelley v. Kraemer in 1948, where the Supreme Court ruled that courts could not enforce racial covenants on real estate, was a landmark moment in the history of 'de jure' segregation. However, this ruling did not stop private individuals from continuing to uphold these covenants, leading to continued segregation. Public housing, initially intended to provide housing for working-class families of all races, soon became a tool for segregation. Separate projects were built for black and white families, often in areas that had previously been racially mixed. This policy further entrenched racial segregation, creating physical barriers that mirrored the social and economic ones. The GI Bill, while ostensibly providing benefits to veterans of all races, was administered in a way that largely excluded African Americans. This further contributed to the racial wealth gap, denying African American veterans the opportunities for economic advancement that their white counterparts enjoyed. These policies and practices laid the foundation for the racial segregation that continues to plague America today. They were not isolated incidents but part of a systematic, government-sanctioned effort to marginalize African Americans. The legacy of these policies is still evident in the racial disparities that exist in housing, education, and wealth. Understanding this history is crucial in addressing and rectifying these disparities. The genesis of segregation is a stark reminder of the enduring impact of discriminatory policies and the need for continued efforts towards racial equality.
02The New Deal Era: A Double-Edged Sword
The New Deal era, a period of intense economic reform and recovery in the United States, was a double-edged sword. While it brought about significant economic recovery and job creation, it also inadvertently deepened the racial divide and institutionalized segregation, particularly in housing. The Public Works Administration (PWA), established during this era, was a key player in this paradox. Tasked with stimulating the economy through job creation and public housing construction, the PWA inadvertently promoted segregation. The housing projects it undertook were often segregated, with separate buildings or neighborhoods for white and black citizens. This policy, known as "redlining," was justified under the guise of maintaining property values and preventing racial tension. However, it effectively institutionalized racial segregation in housing, a legacy that continues to impact the racial wealth gap and housing disparities today. The Federal Housing Administration (FHA), another New Deal institution, further exacerbated this divide. The FHA insured private mortgages, making homeownership accessible to more Americans. However, it refused to insure mortgages in and near African-American neighborhoods, a practice also known as redlining. This policy effectively excluded African Americans from the benefits of homeownership and confined them to urban areas with substandard housing. The Social Security Act of 1935, while a landmark piece of legislation, also played a role in deepening racial disparities. The Act excluded agricultural and domestic workers, a large percentage of whom were African Americans. This exclusion meant that many African Americans were denied access to the social safety net provided by Social Security, further widening the economic divide. The G.I. Bill, passed in 1944, was another policy that had a significant impact on African American communities. While the bill was intended to provide educational and housing benefits to World War II veterans, it was administered in a way that largely excluded African Americans. The G.I. Bill allowed veterans to secure low-interest, no down payment home loans. However, due to the discriminatory practices of the FHA and the Veterans Administration, African American veterans were often denied these loans or were only approved for homes in segregated neighborhoods. In conclusion, the New Deal era, while a period of economic recovery and reform, also deepened the racial divide in America. The policies and institutions established during this time had the unintended consequence of promoting segregation and widening the racial wealth gap. These disparities persist today, a testament to the lasting impact of these policies. The New Deal era, therefore, was indeed a double-edged sword, bringing both economic recovery and racial segregation.

Continue reading with LeapAhead app
Full summary is waiting for you in the app
03The Post-War Housing Boom and the Color Line
04The Civil Rights Movement and the Fight for Housing Equality
05The Legacy of Segregation and the Urban Crisis
06The Path Forward: Remedies and Reconciliation
07Conclusion
About Richard Rothstein
Richard Rothstein is a distinguished fellow of the Economic Policy Institute and a senior fellow emeritus at the Thurgood Marshall Institute of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. He is an expert on education and housing policy, known for his work on the impact of government policies on racial segregation.