
The Sum of Us
Heather McGhee
What's inside?
Explore the deep-rooted issue of racism in America, understand its economic impact on all citizens, and discover how unity and equality can lead to collective prosperity.
You'll learn
Key points
01The rich use racism as a tool to keep us divided and maintain their wealth and power
Heather McGhee's work dives into the idea that racism is a tool used by the powerful to create a wider gap between themselves and the rest of us. This might sound a bit complicated, but let's break it down. First, let's talk about the idea of a zero-sum game. This is a big part of McGhee's argument. In a zero-sum game, if one person wins, another person has to lose. This is how a lot of white folks in America have been led to see race relations - like a competition where if people of color get ahead, they lose out. This idea has been pushed by some media and politicians to create division and keep their own power. Take the 2016 and 2020 elections as an example. A lot of white folks voted for Donald Trump, even though many of his policies didn't really help most of them. They were convinced by the idea that his presidency would protect their place in society from the perceived threat of more racial diversity. This zero-sum view isn't just harmful, it's also wrong. McGhee argues that when we promote racial equality, it's good for everyone, not just people of color. She points to the civil rights victories in the South, which led to economic growth and more investment in things like infrastructure and education that helped the whole region. But this zero-sum idea is so deeply rooted that many white folks are willing to oppose policies that could help them, just because they might also help people of color. This is where McGhee introduces the idea of the "solidarity dividend". This is the economic and moral benefits we all get when we reject the zero-sum game and embrace unity across races. A clear example of this is how we responded to the coronavirus pandemic. Not doing enough to protect Black, brown, and Indigenous lives from the virus didn't just hurt those communities - it made everyone more at risk. But the idea that the virus was mainly a problem for people of color led many white folks to not take it seriously, with tragic results. In the end, McGhee's argument is that racism isn't just a moral problem, it's an economic one. By keeping racial divisions alive, the powerful can keep their wealth and power, while the rest of us - white and non-white - are left fighting over what's left. Her suggested solution is to reject the zero-sum game and work together for a fairer society.
02To get rid of the "winner takes all" mindset, we need to know when and why it started
The idea of a zero-sum game is deeply woven into America's history. This concept, which suggests that one group's gain means another's loss, has been around since the days of colonization and has been kept alive through systemic racism. This zero-sum thinking was first introduced by white colonizers who used it to justify their mistreatment and enslavement of indigenous people and Africans. They spread the idea that if racialized people were to gain freedom or justice, it would mean a loss for white people. This was a calculated move to hold onto the power and resources they had unfairly taken. Take, for example, the European colonizers from Spain, Portugal, and England. They wiped out about 90% of the indigenous populations in North and South America within the first hundred years of contact. This was done through a mix of warfare and disease, all under the pretense of religious superiority. But the real motive was economic - they wanted to fill their coffers with the wealth of the rich native cultures they destroyed. The land was then handed over to wealthy white Americans for free. This zero-sum thinking was further ingrained during the time of slavery. Slave owners, who were mostly white men, used sexual violence as a means to increase their wealth by producing more slaves for forced labor. The system was so twisted that by the 19th century, slave owners could even buy life insurance on their slaves, ensuring that even in death, these slaves would bring in profit. But the zero-sum game isn't just about material wealth. It's also about personal and social identity. The identity of the colonists was defined in contrast to the enslaved Africans among them. This definition loses its meaning in a racially just society, which is why those who resist progress continue to spread the idea that any gain for people of color means a loss for white people. To break down this deeply rooted idea, we first need to understand where it came from and why it's still around. Only then can we work together to create a system that benefits everyone, not just a select few at the expense of many. This is the core message of Heather McGhee's work - that our collective prosperity isn't a zero-sum game, but a shared gain. To give you an idea of the scale of this, in 1860, the 4 million people involved in the domestic slave trade were worth $3 billion. This is a chilling reminder of how the zero-sum game has been used to justify horrific atrocities and exploitation.

Continue reading with LeapAhead app
Full summary is waiting for you in the app
03Slavery made a few people very rich and powerful, and we're still feeling the effects today
04Racism stopped us from having diverse communities, like the ones we used to have at public pools
05Going to college was a big part of the deal for white folks in the 20th century, but not everyone got the same chance
06Most of the problems in our institutions can be traced back to racism, like draining a pool of its water
07Once we understand the real cost of racism, we'll know what we need to do to make things better for everyone
08Conclusion
About Heather McGhee
Heather McGhee is an American political commentator, political strategist, and author. She is a former president of Demos, a non-profit progressive U.S. think tank. McGhee is known for her work on economic and social policy and her advocacy for racial equity.